Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell KD-BOX

Goldshell KD-BOX

Hashrate 1.6 TH/s Power 205 W Efficiency 128.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD6

Goldshell KD6

Hashrate 29.2 TH/s Power 2,630 W Efficiency 90.1 J/TH

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD-BOX Specification Goldshell KD6
1.6 TH/s Hashrate 29.2 TH/s
205 W Power Consumption 2,630 W
128.1 J/TH Efficiency 90.1 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 8,500.0 kg
700 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,974 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2s Algorithm Blake2s
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000074 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$0.49
Daily Profit -$0.43
Monthly -$13.03
Yearly -$158.56

Goldshell KD6

Daily Revenue 0.00001344 BTC $1.05
Daily Electricity -$6.31
Daily Profit -$5.26
Monthly -$157.83
Yearly -$1,920.25

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD6, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1725% more hashrate (1.6 vs 29.2 TH/s). The Goldshell KD-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Goldshell KD6 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell KD-BOX and Goldshell KD6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Goldshell KD6 1725% more hashrate (1.6 vs 29.2 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX 92% better power draw (205 vs 2,630 W)
  • Goldshell KD6 30% better efficiency (128.1 vs 90.1 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD6 1183% more heat output (700 vs 8,974 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell KD-BOX Metric Goldshell KD6
$330 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,027
-$0.43 Daily net profit -$5.26
-$489 Net after 1 year -$2,947
-$647 Net after 2 years -$4,868
-$806 Net after 3 years -$6,788
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell KD-BOX

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD6

90.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD6: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX is more profitable at $-0.43/day compared to $-5.26/day for the Goldshell KD6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD6: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell KD-BOX or the Goldshell KD6?

The Goldshell KD-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell KD-BOX runs at 128.1 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6 runs at 90.1 J/TH — a difference of 38.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficiency (128.1 vs 90.1 J/TH).