Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.6 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 128.1 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 700 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KD-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD-BOX, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 128 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD-BOX 444344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 205 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 128 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 1510% more heat output (11,260 vs 700 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 61% more home mining score (50.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $330 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.43 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$489 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$647 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$806 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX128.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX is more profitable at $-0.43/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell KD-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell KD-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX runs at 128.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,538.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 128 J/TH).