Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.6 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 128.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 700 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell KD-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 128 J/TH). The Goldshell AE-BOX II holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KD-BOX 2962863% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 61% better power draw (530 vs 205 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 128 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 159% more heat output (1,808 vs 700 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $330 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.43 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$489 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$647 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$806 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX128.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell KD-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX is more profitable at $-0.43/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell KD-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell KD-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX runs at 128.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,686.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 128 J/TH).