Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell KD Max

Goldshell KD Max

Hashrate 40.2 TH/s Power 3,350 W Efficiency 83.3 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD5 Pro

Goldshell KD5 Pro

Hashrate 24.5 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 122.5 J/TH

Goldshell KD Max vs Goldshell KD5 Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD Max Specification Goldshell KD5 Pro
40.2 TH/s Hashrate 24.5 TH/s
3,350 W Power Consumption 3,000 W
83.3 J/TH Efficiency 122.5 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 8,500.0 kg
11,430 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,236 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2s Algorithm Blake2s
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD Max

Daily Revenue 0.00001850 BTC $1.45
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$6.59
Monthly -$197.79
Yearly -$2,406.46

Goldshell KD5 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00001127 BTC $0.88
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$6.32
Monthly -$189.54
Yearly -$2,306.12

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD Max edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 64% more hashrate (40.2 vs 24.5 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD Max's favour. That said, the Goldshell KD5 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell KD Max — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell KD Max and Goldshell KD5 Pro sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell KD Max 64% more hashrate (40.2 vs 24.5 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KD5 Pro 10% better power draw (3,350 vs 3,000 W)
  • Goldshell KD Max 32% better efficiency (83.3 vs 122.5 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD Max 12% more heat output (11,430 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell KD Max Metric Goldshell KD5 Pro
$1,320 Upfront cost (MSRP) $899
-$6.59 Daily net profit -$6.32
-$3,726 Net after 1 year -$3,205
-$6,133 Net after 2 years -$5,511
-$8,539 Net after 3 years -$7,817
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD Max

83.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell KD Max or Goldshell KD5 Pro more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD5 Pro is more profitable at $-6.32/day compared to $-6.59/day for the Goldshell KD Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell KD Max or Goldshell KD5 Pro?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell KD Max or the Goldshell KD5 Pro?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Goldshell KD Max and Goldshell KD5 Pro on J/TH?

The Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH while the Goldshell KD5 Pro runs at 122.5 J/TH — a difference of 39.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficiency (83.3 vs 122.5 J/TH).