Iceriver KS0 vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS0
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS3M edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 5900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 6.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS3M's favour. The Iceriver KS0 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KS0 and Iceriver KS3M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3M 5900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,400.0 W)
- Iceriver KS3M 13% better efficiency (650 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 85% better weight (2.5 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 5130% more heat output (222 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$56 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$111 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$167 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KS0 or Iceriver KS3M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver KS0 vs Iceriver KS3M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KS3M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KS0 or the Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KS0 and Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 83.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (650 vs 567 J/TH).