PiAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| PiAxe | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Power Consumption | 2,600 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 78.8 J/TH |
| 30 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.2 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,871 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
PiAxe
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the PiAxe comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,600.0 W). The Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the PiAxe and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 6500% more hashrate (0.5 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- PiAxe 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,600.0 W)
- PiAxe 62% better efficiency (30.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
- PiAxe 100% better weight (0.2 vs 10,000.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 17227% more heat output (51.2 vs 8,871.2 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 218% more home mining score (70.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| PiAxe | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$5.04 |
| -$85 | Net after 1 year | -$1,839 |
| -$92 | Net after 2 years | -$3,679 |
| -$98 | Net after 3 years | -$5,518 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
PiAxe30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the PiAxe or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-5.04/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the PiAxe or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
PiAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which fits a residential setup better?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between PiAxe and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?
The PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 48.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (30.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).
Compare PiAxe with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator