Obelisk SC1 Immersion vs StrongU STU-U2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Obelisk SC1 Immersion | Specification | StrongU STU-U2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TH/s | Hashrate | 7.0 TH/s |
| 1,600 W | Power Consumption | 1,600 W |
| 727.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 228.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 6,500.0 kg |
| 5,459 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b | Algorithm | Blake2b |
| Obelisk | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Obelisk SC1 Immersion
StrongU STU-U2
Based on BTC price of $74,143 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the StrongU STU-U2 offers 69% better efficiency at 228.6 J/TH compared to the Obelisk SC1 Immersion at 727.3 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU STU-U2228.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Obelisk SC1 Immersion or StrongU STU-U2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU STU-U2 is more profitable at $-3.62/day compared to $-3.77/day for the Obelisk SC1 Immersion. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Obelisk SC1 Immersion or StrongU STU-U2?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Obelisk SC1 Immersion or StrongU STU-U2?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Obelisk SC1 Immersion and StrongU STU-U2?
The Obelisk SC1 Immersion runs at 727.3 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U2 runs at 228.6 J/TH — a difference of 498.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.