StrongU STU-U1 vs StrongU STU-U2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| StrongU STU-U1 | Specification | StrongU STU-U2 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 7.0 TH/s |
| 1,600 W | Power Consumption | 1,600 W |
| 145.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 228.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | 6,500.0 kg |
| 5,459 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | Blake2b |
| StrongU | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
StrongU STU-U1
StrongU STU-U2
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the StrongU STU-U1 wins on 2 of 2 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 36% better efficiency (145 vs 229 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the StrongU STU-U1 and StrongU STU-U2 sit on each measurable spec:
- StrongU STU-U1 57% more hashrate (11.0 vs 7.0 TH/s)
- StrongU STU-U1 36% better efficiency (145 vs 229 J/TH)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| StrongU STU-U1 | Metric | StrongU STU-U2 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$3.45 | Daily net profit | -$3.59 |
| -$1,258 | Net after 1 year | -$1,809 |
| -$2,515 | Net after 2 years | -$3,119 |
| -$3,773 | Net after 3 years | -$4,429 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU STU-U1145.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
StrongU STU-U1 vs StrongU STU-U2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU STU-U1 is more profitable at $-3.45/day compared to $-3.59/day for the StrongU STU-U2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the StrongU STU-U1 or StrongU STU-U2?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
StrongU STU-U1 vs StrongU STU-U2: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
StrongU STU-U1 vs StrongU STU-U2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The StrongU STU-U1 runs at 145.5 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U2 runs at 228.6 J/TH — a difference of 83.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficiency (145 vs 229 J/TH).