Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

StrongU Hornbill H8

StrongU Hornbill H8

Hashrate 74.0 TH/s Power 3,330 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS
StrongU STU-U1

StrongU STU-U1

Hashrate 11.0 TH/s Power 1,600 W Efficiency 145.5 J/TH

StrongU Hornbill H8 vs StrongU STU-U1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

StrongU Hornbill H8 Specification StrongU STU-U1
74.0 TH/s Hashrate 11.0 TH/s
3,330 W Power Consumption 1,600 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 145.5 J/TH
Noise Level
11,500.0 kg Weight 6,500.0 kg
11,362 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,459 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm Blake256r14
StrongU Manufacturer StrongU

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

StrongU Hornbill H8

Daily Revenue 0.00003405 BTC $2.65
Daily Electricity -$7.99
Daily Profit -$5.34
Monthly -$160.15
Yearly -$1,948.46

StrongU STU-U1

Daily Revenue 0.00000506 BTC $0.39
Daily Electricity -$3.84
Daily Profit -$3.45
Monthly -$103.37
Yearly -$1,257.62

Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the StrongU Hornbill H8 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 573% more hashrate (74.0 vs 11.0 TH/s) in the StrongU Hornbill H8's favour. The StrongU STU-U1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: StrongU Hornbill H8 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the StrongU Hornbill H8 and StrongU STU-U1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • StrongU Hornbill H8 573% more hashrate (74.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
  • StrongU STU-U1 52% better power draw (3,330 vs 1,600 W)
  • StrongU Hornbill H8 69% better efficiency (45.0 vs 145.5 J/TH)
  • StrongU STU-U1 43% better weight (11,500 vs 6,500 kg)
  • StrongU Hornbill H8 108% more heat output (11,362 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
  • StrongU STU-U1 27% more home mining score (22.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

StrongU Hornbill H8 Metric StrongU STU-U1
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.34 Daily net profit -$3.45
-$3,148 Net after 1 year -$1,258
-$5,097 Net after 2 years -$2,515
-$7,045 Net after 3 years -$3,773
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

StrongU STU-U1

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

StrongU Hornbill H8

45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the StrongU Hornbill H8 or StrongU STU-U1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU STU-U1 is more profitable at $-3.45/day compared to $-5.34/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the StrongU Hornbill H8 or the StrongU STU-U1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the StrongU Hornbill H8 or StrongU STU-U1?

The StrongU STU-U1 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between StrongU Hornbill H8 and StrongU STU-U1?

The StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U1 runs at 145.5 J/TH — a difference of 100.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (45.0 vs 145.5 J/TH).