Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

StrongU Hornbill H8

StrongU Hornbill H8

Hashrate 74.0 TH/s Power 3,330 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS
StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro

StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro

Hashrate 84.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH

StrongU Hornbill H8 vs StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

StrongU Hornbill H8 Specification StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro
74.0 TH/s Hashrate 84.0 TH/s
3,330 W Power Consumption 3,360 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
Noise Level
11,500.0 kg Weight 11,500.0 kg
11,362 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,464 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
StrongU Manufacturer StrongU

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

StrongU Hornbill H8

Daily Revenue 0.00003405 BTC $2.66
Daily Electricity -$7.99
Daily Profit -$5.33
Monthly -$159.93
Yearly -$1,945.85

StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00003866 BTC $3.02
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$5.04
Monthly -$151.31
Yearly -$1,840.88

Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 14% more hashrate (74.0 vs 84.0 TH/s). That said, the StrongU Hornbill H8 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the StrongU Hornbill H8 and StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro 14% more hashrate (74.0 vs 84.0 TH/s)
  • StrongU Hornbill H8 1% better power draw (3,330 vs 3,360 W)
  • StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro 11% better efficiency (45.0 vs 40.0 J/TH)
  • StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro 1% more heat output (11,362 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

StrongU Hornbill H8 Metric StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.33 Daily net profit -$5.04
-$3,146 Net after 1 year -$1,841
-$5,092 Net after 2 years -$3,682
-$7,038 Net after 3 years -$5,523
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro

40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

StrongU Hornbill H8 vs StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro is more profitable at $-5.04/day compared to $-5.33/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the StrongU Hornbill H8 or StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the StrongU Hornbill H8 or the StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

StrongU Hornbill H8 vs StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 Pro runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 11% better efficiency (45.0 vs 40.0 J/TH).