Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

StrongU Hornbill H8

StrongU Hornbill H8

Hashrate 74.0 TH/s Power 3,330 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS
StrongU STU-U8 Pro

StrongU STU-U8 Pro

Hashrate 60.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 46.7 J/TH

StrongU Hornbill H8 vs StrongU STU-U8 Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

StrongU Hornbill H8 Specification StrongU STU-U8 Pro
74.0 TH/s Hashrate 60.0 TH/s
3,330 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 46.7 J/TH
Noise Level
11,500.0 kg Weight 8,200.0 kg
11,362 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
StrongU Manufacturer StrongU

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

StrongU Hornbill H8

Daily Revenue 0.00003405 BTC $2.66
Daily Electricity -$7.99
Daily Profit -$5.33
Monthly -$159.93
Yearly -$1,945.85

StrongU STU-U8 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00002761 BTC $2.16
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$4.56
Monthly -$136.88
Yearly -$1,665.31

Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the StrongU Hornbill H8 edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 23% more hashrate (74.0 vs 60.0 TH/s). The StrongU STU-U8 Pro holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: StrongU Hornbill H8 — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the StrongU Hornbill H8 and StrongU STU-U8 Pro sit on each measurable spec:

  • StrongU Hornbill H8 23% more hashrate (74.0 vs 60.0 TH/s)
  • StrongU STU-U8 Pro 16% better power draw (3,330 vs 2,800 W)
  • StrongU Hornbill H8 4% better efficiency (45.0 vs 46.7 J/TH)
  • StrongU STU-U8 Pro 29% better weight (11,500 vs 8,200 kg)
  • StrongU Hornbill H8 19% more heat output (11,362 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

StrongU Hornbill H8 Metric StrongU STU-U8 Pro
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.33 Daily net profit -$4.56
-$3,146 Net after 1 year -$1,665
-$5,092 Net after 2 years -$3,331
-$7,038 Net after 3 years -$4,996
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

StrongU Hornbill H8

45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the StrongU Hornbill H8 or the StrongU STU-U8 Pro?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU STU-U8 Pro is more profitable at $-4.56/day compared to $-5.33/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the StrongU Hornbill H8 or the StrongU STU-U8 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

StrongU Hornbill H8 vs StrongU STU-U8 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between StrongU Hornbill H8 and StrongU STU-U8 Pro?

The StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U8 Pro runs at 46.7 J/TH — a difference of 1.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficiency (45.0 vs 46.7 J/TH).