Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

StrongU STU-U8

StrongU STU-U8

Hashrate 46.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 45.7 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M21

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Hashrate 31.0 TH/s Power 1,860 W Efficiency 60.0 J/TH

StrongU STU-U8 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

StrongU STU-U8 Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M21
46.0 TH/s Hashrate 31.0 TH/s
2,100 W Power Consumption 1,860 W
45.7 J/TH Efficiency 60.0 J/TH
Noise Level
8,200.0 kg Weight 7,150.0 kg
7,165 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,346 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
StrongU Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

StrongU STU-U8

Daily Revenue 0.00002117 BTC $1.66
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$3.38
Monthly -$101.50
Yearly -$1,234.89

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Daily Revenue 0.00001427 BTC $1.12
Daily Electricity -$4.46
Daily Profit -$3.35
Monthly -$100.42
Yearly -$1,221.84

Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the StrongU STU-U8 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 48% more hashrate (46.0 vs 31.0 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: StrongU STU-U8 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the StrongU STU-U8 and MicroBT Whatsminer M21 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • StrongU STU-U8 48% more hashrate (46.0 vs 31.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 11% better power draw (2,100 vs 1,860 W)
  • StrongU STU-U8 24% better efficiency (45.7 vs 60.0 J/TH)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 13% better weight (8,200 vs 7,150 kg)
  • StrongU STU-U8 13% more heat output (7,165 vs 6,346 BTU/hr)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 8% more home mining score (26.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

StrongU STU-U8

45.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

StrongU STU-U8 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 is more profitable at $-3.35/day compared to $-3.38/day for the StrongU STU-U8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

StrongU STU-U8 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

StrongU STU-U8 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21: which fits a residential setup better?

The MicroBT Whatsminer M21 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between StrongU STU-U8 and MicroBT Whatsminer M21?

The StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 runs at 60.0 J/TH — a difference of 14.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficiency (45.7 vs 60.0 J/TH).