Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Hashrate 25.0 TH/s Power 2,050 W Efficiency 82.0 J/TH
VS
FluMiner T3

FluMiner T3

Hashrate 115.0 TH/s Power 1,700 W Efficiency 14.8 J/TH

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs FluMiner T3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T Specification FluMiner T3
25.0 TH/s Hashrate 115.0 TH/s
2,050 W Power Consumption 1,700 W
82.0 J/TH Efficiency 14.8 J/TH
Noise Level 50 dB
9,000.0 kg Weight 12.6 kg
6,995 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 56/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer FluMiner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Daily Revenue 0.00001150 BTC $0.91
Daily Electricity -$4.92
Daily Profit -$4.01
Monthly -$120.29
Yearly -$1,463.54

FluMiner T3

Daily Revenue 0.00005292 BTC $4.19
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit $0.11
Monthly $3.22
Yearly $39.21

Based on BTC price of $79,126 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the FluMiner T3 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 82% better efficiency (82.0 vs 14.8 J/TH) in the FluMiner T3's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: FluMiner T3 — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T and FluMiner T3 sit on each measurable spec:

  • FluMiner T3 360% more hashrate (25.0 vs 115.0 TH/s)
  • FluMiner T3 17% better power draw (2,050 vs 1,700 W)
  • FluMiner T3 82% better efficiency (82.0 vs 14.8 J/TH)
  • FluMiner T3 100% better weight (9,000.0 vs 12.6 kg)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T 21% more heat output (6,995 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • FluMiner T3 115% more home mining score (26.0 vs 56.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T Metric FluMiner T3
Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,601
-$4.01 Daily net profit $0.11
-$1,464 Net after 1 year -$1,562
-$2,927 Net after 2 years -$1,522
-$4,391 Net after 3 years -$1,483
Payback period Takes ~40.8 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

FluMiner T3

$4.12/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

FluMiner T3

Score: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

FluMiner T3

14.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs FluMiner T3: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner T3 is more profitable at $0.11/day compared to $-4.01/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T or the FluMiner T3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The FluMiner T3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs FluMiner T3: which fits a residential setup better?

The FluMiner T3 scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T and FluMiner T3?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T runs at 82.0 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 67.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (82.0 vs 14.8 J/TH).