iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4-1U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Specification | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| 280.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 520.0 MH/s |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 857,142.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Jasminer X4-1U
Based on BTC price of $78,214 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X4-1U comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 2 (efficiency, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 46% better efficiency (857,143 vs 461,538 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus and Jasminer X4-1U diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X4-1U 86% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4-1U 46% better efficiency (857,143 vs 461,538 J/TH)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Metric | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $209 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$579 | Net after 1 year | -$419 |
| -$789 | Net after 2 years | -$629 |
| -$1,000 | Net after 3 years | -$840 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4-1U461,538.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or the Jasminer X4-1U?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-0.58/day for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4-1U: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or Jasminer X4-1U?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4-1U: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus runs at 857,142.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-1U runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 395,604.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficiency (857,143 vs 461,538 J/TH).