iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4-1U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 520.0 MH/s |
| 104 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 355 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Jasminer X4-1U
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X4-1U edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini Classic holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4-1U diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X4-1U 300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 57% better power draw (104 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X4-1U 42% better efficiency (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4-1U 131% more heat output (355 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4-1U 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| $285 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $209 |
| -$0.25 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$376 | Net after 1 year | -$419 |
| -$467 | Net after 2 years | -$629 |
| -$558 | Net after 3 years | -$840 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4-1UScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4-1U461,538.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4-1U more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-0.58/day for the Jasminer X4-1U. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or the Jasminer X4-1U better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4-1U: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X4-1U scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4-1U on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-1U runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 338,461.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH).