iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 vs Jasminer X44-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 | Specification | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| 280.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 23.4 GH/s |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 2,550 W |
| 785,714.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 108,974.4 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | 15.7 kg |
| 751 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,701 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
Jasminer X44-P
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X44-P wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 8257% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 and Jasminer X44-P actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X44-P 8257% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 91% better power draw (220 vs 2,550 W)
- Jasminer X44-P 86% better efficiency (785,714 vs 108,974 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 50% better noise (40.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 87% better weight (2.1 vs 15.7 kg)
- Jasminer X44-P 1059% more heat output (751 vs 8,701 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 128% more home mining score (66.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 | Metric | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| $700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,580 |
| -$0.53 | Daily net profit | -$6.12 |
| -$893 | Net after 1 year | -$7,813 |
| -$1,085 | Net after 2 years | -$10,047 |
| -$1,278 | Net after 3 years | -$12,280 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X44-P108,974.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 vs Jasminer X44-P: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-6.12/day for the Jasminer X44-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 or Jasminer X44-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X44-P at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 or the Jasminer X44-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Jasminer X44-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 vs Jasminer X44-P: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 runs at 785,714.3 J/TH while the Jasminer X44-P runs at 108,974.4 J/TH — a difference of 676,739.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (785,714 vs 108,974 J/TH).