Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell XT-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 580.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 689.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell XT-BOX
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell XT-BOX, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 690 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell XT-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell XT-BOX 1073974% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 25% better power draw (530 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 690 J/TH)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 25% better weight (3.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 33% more heat output (1,808 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT-BOX 6% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell XT-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $940 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.94 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$1,284 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$1,628 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$1,973 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT-BOX689.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell XT-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT-BOX is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell XT-BOX?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell XT-BOX?
The Goldshell XT-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Goldshell AE-BOX II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell XT-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell XT-BOX runs at 689.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,125.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 690 J/TH).