Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 105.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 115 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,095.2 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 392 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS1-PLUS
Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS1-PLUS, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,095 J/TH) in the Goldshell HS1-PLUS's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS1-PLUS sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 29067% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 97% better power draw (3,300 vs 115 W)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,095 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS1-PLUS 96% better weight (13.5 vs 0.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 2769% more heat output (11,260 vs 392 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 67% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS1-PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $900 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.27 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,000 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,099 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS1-PLUS1,095.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS1-PLUS: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS1-PLUS is more profitable at $-0.27/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS1-PLUS better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS1-PLUS at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell HS1-PLUS?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell HS1-PLUS). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS1-PLUS on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS1-PLUS runs at 1,095.2 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,571.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,095 J/TH).