Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 3.3 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Sha3x |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 650 J/TH) in the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)'s favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 27678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 98% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 650 J/TH)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 76% better weight (13.5 vs 3.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 4976% more heat output (11,260 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) 42% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $89 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$201 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$257 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s): which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s)?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell XT Card (100Gh/s) runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,016.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 650 J/TH).