Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.6 GH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 861,111.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 13,000.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
iPollo V1
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer E9 Pro l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 31% better efficacité (597,826 vs 861,111 J/TH). The iPollo V1 holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer E9 Pro 2% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 29% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,100 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 31% better efficacité (597,826 vs 861,111 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 13,000.0 kg)
- iPollo V1 41% more heat output (7,506 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 82% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,699 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$4,415 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$7,130 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$9,846 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V1?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V1?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH — a difference of 263,285.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficacité (597,826 vs 861,111 J/TH).