Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Specification | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 235.0 GH/s |
| 2,079 W | Consommation électrique | 230 W |
| 231.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 978.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | — |
| 7,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithme | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer HS3
Goldshell HS-BOX
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer HS3 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 3730% more hashrate (9.0 vs 0.2 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer HS3's favour. The Goldshell HS-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 and Goldshell HS-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 3730% more hashrate (9.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 89% better power draw (2,079 vs 230 W)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 76% better efficacité (231 vs 979 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 804% more heat output (7,094 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 19% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Metric | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $900 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$4.73 | Daily net profit | -$0.55 |
| -$2,628 | Net after 1 year | -$298 |
| -$4,355 | Net after 2 years | -$497 |
| -$6,083 | Net after 3 years | -$696 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS-BOXScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer HS3231.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Bitmain Antminer HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or Goldshell HS-BOX?
The Goldshell HS-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 runs at 231.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH — a difference of 747.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (231 vs 979 J/TH).