Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs VOLCMINER D3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | VOLCMINER D3 |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 20.0 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 3,580 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 179,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.4 kg | Weight | 22.0 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | VOLCMINER |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
VOLCMINER D3
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le VOLCMINER D3 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 3348% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and VOLCMINER D3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- VOLCMINER D3 3348% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 74% better power draw (942 vs 3,580 W)
- VOLCMINER D3 89% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 179,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 80% better weight (4.4 vs 22.0 kg)
- VOLCMINER D3 280% more heat output (3,214 vs 12,215 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | VOLCMINER D3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,990 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$8.59 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$9,126 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$12,262 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$15,398 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D3179,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the VOLCMINER D3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-8.59/day for the VOLCMINER D3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or VOLCMINER D3?
The VOLCMINER D3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or VOLCMINER D3?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and VOLCMINER D3?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D3 runs at 179,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,445,137.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 179,000 J/TH).