Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell LT6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 955,223.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4.4 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Goldshell LT6
Based on BTC price of $73,464 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell LT6 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 478% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Goldshell LT6 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell LT6 478% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 71% better power draw (942 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell LT6 41% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 955,224 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 65% better weight (4.4 vs 12.5 kg)
- Goldshell LT6 240% more heat output (3,214 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $970 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$3,773 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$6,576 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$9,379 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT6955,223.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell LT6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell LT6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Goldshell LT6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell LT6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell LT6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Goldshell LT6 runs at 955,223.9 J/TH — a difference of 668,914.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 955,224 J/TH).