Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 800.0 MH/s |
| 3,425 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 360,526.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1088% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 1088% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 85% better power draw (3,425 vs 500 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 42% better efficacité (360,526 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 79% better weight (15.0 vs 3.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 585% more heat output (11,686 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 182% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $821 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$3,822 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$6,822 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$9,822 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)360,526.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) runs at 360,526.3 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 264,473.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (360,526 vs 625,000 J/TH).