Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Nerdminer
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Nerdminer |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 50.0 KH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 1 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 20,000,000.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.1 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 35/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Nerdminer
Based on BTC price of $78,162 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9), which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 27999999900% more hashrate (14.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)'s favour. The Nerdminer claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Nerdminer actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 27999999900% more hashrate (14.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Nerdminer 100% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 1.0 W)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better efficacité (96.4 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH)
- Nerdminer 99% better weight (6.0 vs 0.1 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 135376% more heat output (4,606.2 vs 3.4 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 69% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 35.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Nerdminer |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $29 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$30 |
| -$2,347 | Net after 2 years | -$31 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$32 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)96.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Nerdminer: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Nerdminer is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Nerdminer?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Nerdminer at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Nerdminer: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 35/100 for the Nerdminer). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Nerdminer: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Nerdminer runs at 20,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 19,999,903.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (96.4 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH).