Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdQAxe++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 120 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 409 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
NerdQAxe++
Based on BTC price of $61,310 and current network difficulty as of Jun 6, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the NerdQAxe++ edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 91% better power draw (1,350 vs 120 W). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and NerdQAxe++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 250% more hashrate (14.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- NerdQAxe++ 91% better power draw (1,350 vs 120 W)
- NerdQAxe++ 69% better efficacité (96.4 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- NerdQAxe++ 24% better noise (55.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- NerdQAxe++ 92% better weight (6.0 vs 0.5 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 1025% more heat output (4,606 vs 409 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 2% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $349 |
| -$2.85 | Daily net profit | -$0.18 |
| -$1,390 | Net after 1 year | -$414 |
| -$2,431 | Net after 2 years | -$478 |
| -$3,472 | Net after 3 years | -$543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdQAxe++30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the NerdQAxe++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe++ is more profitable at $-0.18/day compared to $-2.85/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or NerdQAxe++?
The NerdQAxe++ is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the NerdQAxe++?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 58/100 for the NerdQAxe++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and NerdQAxe++?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the NerdQAxe++ runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 66.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (96.4 vs 30.0 J/TH).