Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs NerdQAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | NerdQAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 80 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 273 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
NerdQAxe
Based on BTC price of $76,979 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le NerdQAxe l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 94% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 80.0 W). That said, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and NerdQAxe sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 600% more hashrate (14.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- NerdQAxe 94% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 80.0 W)
- NerdQAxe 59% better efficacité (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- NerdQAxe 27% better noise (55.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- NerdQAxe 93% better weight (6.0 vs 0.4 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 1587% more heat output (4,606 vs 273 BTU/hr)
- NerdQAxe 20% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | NerdQAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $249 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.12 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 1 year | -$293 |
| -$2,352 | Net after 2 years | -$337 |
| -$3,354 | Net after 3 years | -$382 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdQAxeScore: 71/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdQAxe40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the NerdQAxe?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the NerdQAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdQAxe is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the NerdQAxe?
The NerdQAxe scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and NerdQAxe?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the NerdQAxe runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 56.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH).