Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 255.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 5,304 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 20.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.1 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 18,097 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 538% more hashrate (255.0 vs 40.0 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 XP Hyd's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 538% more hashrate (255.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 59% better power draw (5,304 vs 2,200 W)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 62% better efficacité (20.8 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 100% better weight (13.1 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 141% more heat output (18,097 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 69% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $6,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $155 |
| -$3.71 | Daily net profit | -$3.86 |
| -$7,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,566 |
| -$9,205 | Net after 2 years | -$2,976 |
| -$10,558 | Net after 3 years | -$4,387 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XP HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP Hyd20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is more profitable at $-3.71/day compared to $-3.86/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S19 XP Hyd and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 34.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (20.8 vs 55.0 J/TH).