Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs NerdQAxe++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Specification | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 PH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 11,020 W | Consommation électrique | 120 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| — | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 37,600 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 409 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U
NerdQAxe++
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 28900% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 4.0 TH/s). The NerdQAxe++ holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U and NerdQAxe++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 28900% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- NerdQAxe++ 99% better power draw (11,020 vs 120 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 68% better efficacité (9.5 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- NerdQAxe++ 16% better noise (50.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 9084% more heat output (37,600 vs 409 BTU/hr)
- NerdQAxe++ 32% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Metric | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| $7,988 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $349 |
| $12.11 | Daily net profit | -$0.16 |
| -$3,568 | Net after 1 year | -$406 |
| +$852 | Net after 2 years | -$462 |
| +$5,272 | Net after 3 years | -$519 |
| Pays for itself in ~22 months at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U$12.27/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
NerdQAxe++Score: 58/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs NerdQAxe++: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is more profitable at $12.11/day compared to $-0.16/day for the NerdQAxe++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs NerdQAxe++: which runs at a lower noise level?
The NerdQAxe++ is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or NerdQAxe++?
The NerdQAxe++ scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U and NerdQAxe++ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U runs at 9.5 J/TH while the NerdQAxe++ runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (9.5 vs 30.0 J/TH).