Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 137.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Intel |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 100% better power draw (1,300.0 vs 2.5 W) in the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)'s favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 9389% more hashrate (13.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (1,300.0 vs 2.5 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 82% better efficacité (100.0 vs 18.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 52084% more heat output (4,435.6 vs 8.5 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$1,070 | Net after 1 year | -$1 |
| -$2,074 | Net after 2 years | -$2 |
| -$3,079 | Net after 3 years | -$2 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-2.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH — a difference of 81.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (100.0 vs 18.3 J/TH).