Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs PiAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Specification | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
PiAxe
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the PiAxe edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 100% better power draw (3,200.0 vs 15.0 W) in the PiAxe's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) and PiAxe actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 12700% more hashrate (64.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- PiAxe 100% better power draw (3,200.0 vs 15.0 W)
- PiAxe 40% better efficacité (50.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- PiAxe 98% better weight (10.0 vs 0.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 21225% more heat output (10,918.4 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 218% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Metric | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $75 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$5.55 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$2,101 | Net after 1 year | -$86 |
| -$4,128 | Net after 2 years | -$93 |
| -$6,154 | Net after 3 years | -$100 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
PiAxe30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs PiAxe: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-5.55/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or the PiAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs PiAxe: which fits a residential setup better?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs PiAxe: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) runs at 50.0 J/TH while the PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficacité (50.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).