Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs Bitaxe Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Specification | Bitaxe Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 1,432 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 136.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 4,886 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Bitaxe Ultra
Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Ultra edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 99% better power draw (1,432.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and Bitaxe Ultra actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 2000% more hashrate (10.5 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Ultra 99% better power draw (1,432.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Ultra 78% better efficacité (136.4 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Ultra 93% better weight (4.2 vs 0.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 9443% more heat output (4,886.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Ultra 126% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Metric | Bitaxe Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$3.14 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$2,101 | Net after 1 year | -$87 |
| -$3,247 | Net after 2 years | -$95 |
| -$4,393 | Net after 3 years | -$103 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe UltraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Ultra30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the Bitaxe Ultra?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-3.14/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the Bitaxe Ultra better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the Bitaxe Ultra?
The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs Bitaxe Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 106.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficacité (136.4 vs 30.0 J/TH).