Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Taux de hachage 150.0 TH/s Puissance 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Taux de hachage 25.0 TH/s Puissance 2,050 W Efficiency 82.0 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T
150.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 25.0 TH/s
3,230 W Consommation électrique 2,050 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 82.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.8 kg Weight 9.0 kg
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,995 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00006786 BTC $4.27
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$3.48
Monthly -$104.34
Yearly -$1,269.51

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Daily Revenue 0.00001131 BTC $0.71
Daily Electricity -$4.92
Daily Profit -$4.21
Monthly -$126.23
Yearly -$1,535.81

Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1466 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 500% more hashrate (150.0 vs 25.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1466 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1466 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Avalon A1466 500% more hashrate (150.0 vs 25.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T 37% better power draw (3,230 vs 2,050 W)
  • Avalon A1466 74% better efficacité (21.5 vs 82.0 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T 30% better weight (12.8 vs 9.0 kg)
  • Avalon A1466 58% more heat output (11,021 vs 6,995 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1466 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1466 Metric Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.48 Daily net profit -$4.21
-$5,470 Net after 1 year -$1,536
-$6,739 Net after 2 years -$3,072
-$8,009 Net after 3 years -$4,607
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1466

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1466

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1466 or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-3.48/day compared to $-4.21/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1466 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T?

The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Avalon A1466 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T: which fits a residential setup better?

The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1466 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T runs at 82.0 J/TH — a difference of 60.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (21.5 vs 82.0 J/TH).