Canaan Avalon Nano 3 vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3 | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 390.0 TH/s |
| 1,400 W | Consommation électrique | 7,215 W |
| 350.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 0.7 kg | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 4,777 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M63S edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 9650% more hashrate (4.0 vs 390.0 TH/s). The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 and Whatsminer M63S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M63S 9650% more hashrate (4.0 vs 390.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 81% better power draw (1,400 vs 7,215 W)
- Whatsminer M63S 95% better efficacité (350.0 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 30% better noise (35.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 97% better weight (0.7 vs 28.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M63S 415% more heat output (4,777 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 50% more score de minage domestique (66.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3 | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| $149 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$3.25 | Daily net profit | -$6.20 |
| -$1,334 | Net after 1 year | -$14,264 |
| -$2,519 | Net after 2 years | -$16,529 |
| -$3,703 | Net after 3 years | -$18,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M63S18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 or the Whatsminer M63S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is more profitable at $-3.25/day compared to $-6.20/day for the Whatsminer M63S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 or the Whatsminer M63S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Whatsminer M63S at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 or Whatsminer M63S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Whatsminer M63S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon Nano 3 and Whatsminer M63S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 331.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (350.0 vs 18.5 J/TH).