Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3S | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 512.0 TH/s |
| 140 W | Consommation électrique | 7,424 W |
| 23.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| 30 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 0.9 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 478 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 25,331 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
MicroBT WhatsMiner M73
Based on BTC price of $75,219 and current network difficulty as of May 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 8433% more hashrate (6.0 vs 512.0 TH/s). The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 8433% more hashrate (6.0 vs 512.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 98% better power draw (140 vs 7,424 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 38% better efficacité (23.3 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 60% better noise (30.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 97% better weight (0.9 vs 27.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 5203% more heat output (478 vs 25,331 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 117% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3S | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 |
|---|---|---|
| $145 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.13 | Daily net profit | -$0.09 |
| -$192 | Net after 1 year | -$35 |
| -$239 | Net after 2 years | -$69 |
| -$286 | Net after 3 years | -$104 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7314.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-0.13/day for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon Nano 3S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M73?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 8.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (23.3 vs 14.5 J/TH).