Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo B1L

iPollo B1L

Taux de hachage 58.0 TH/s Puissance 3,000 W Efficiency 51.7 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Taux de hachage 1,200.0 GH/s Puissance 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH

iPollo B1L vs Bitaxe Gamma

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo B1L Specification Bitaxe Gamma
58.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 1,200.0 GH/s
3,000 W Consommation électrique 15 W
51.7 J/TH Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 38 dB
12.7 kg Weight 0.3 kg
10,236 BTU/hr BTU Output 51 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
iPollo Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo B1L

Daily Revenue 0.00002624 BTC $1.65
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$5.55
Monthly -$166.55
Yearly -$2,026.33

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000054 BTC $0.03
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.06
Yearly -$0.69

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Gamma edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the iPollo B1L isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and Bitaxe Gamma sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo B1L 4733% more hashrate (58.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 100% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 15.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 76% better efficacité (51.7 vs 12.5 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 98% better weight (12.7 vs 0.3 kg)
  • iPollo B1L 19892% more heat output (10,236.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 218% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo B1L Metric Bitaxe Gamma
$430 Upfront cost (MSRP) $99
-$5.55 Daily net profit -$0.00
-$2,456 Net after 1 year -$100
-$4,483 Net after 2 years -$100
-$6,509 Net after 3 years -$101
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Gamma

Score: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iPollo B1L or Bitaxe Gamma more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.55/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo B1L or the Bitaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo B1L or the Bitaxe Gamma?

The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and Bitaxe Gamma?

The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 39.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (51.7 vs 12.5 J/TH).