iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 262.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1 Max
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC6 SE edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 42% more hashrate (12.0 vs 17.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC6 SE's favour. That said, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell SC6 SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC6 SE 42% more hashrate (12.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 5% better power draw (3,150 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 26% better efficacité (263 vs 194 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 22% better weight (9.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 5% more heat output (10,748 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$7.16 | Daily net profit | -$7.35 |
| -$3,513 | Net after 1 year | -$3,714 |
| -$6,127 | Net after 2 years | -$6,398 |
| -$8,740 | Net after 3 years | -$9,083 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC6 SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max is more profitable at $-7.16/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or the Goldshell SC6 SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell SC6 SE on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-S1 Max runs at 262.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 68.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficacité (263 vs 194 J/TH).