Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC6 SE l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 31481381% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC6 SE's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX II holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell SC6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC6 SE 31481381% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 74% better weight (3.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 523% more heat output (1,808 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 195% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$7.35 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$3,713 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$6,398 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$9,082 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell SC6 SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,620.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 194 J/TH).