Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC6 SE l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 45945846% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell SC6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC6 SE 45945846% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 89% better power draw (360 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 80% better weight (2.3 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 817% more heat output (1,228 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 214% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.35 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,713 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$6,398 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$9,082 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,535.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 194 J/TH).