Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink BM-S1

iBeLink BM-S1

Taux de hachage 6.8 TH/s Puissance 2,350 W Efficiency 345.6 J/TH
VS
iBeLink BM-S1 Max

iBeLink BM-S1 Max

Taux de hachage 12.0 TH/s Puissance 3,150 W Efficiency 262.5 J/TH

iBeLink BM-S1 vs iBeLink BM-S1 Max

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-S1 Specification iBeLink BM-S1 Max
6.8 TH/s Taux de hachage 12.0 TH/s
2,350 W Consommation électrique 3,150 W
345.6 J/TH Efficiency 262.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
9.0 kg Weight 9.0 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,748 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithme Blake2b-sia
iBeLink Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-S1

Daily Revenue 0.00000308 BTC $0.23
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.41
Monthly -$162.42
Yearly -$1,976.10

iBeLink BM-S1 Max

Daily Revenue 0.00000543 BTC $0.40
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$7.16
Monthly -$214.83
Yearly -$2,613.81

Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 76% more hashrate (6.8 vs 12.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-S1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink BM-S1 Max — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 and iBeLink BM-S1 Max sit on each measurable spec:

  • iBeLink BM-S1 Max 76% more hashrate (6.8 vs 12.0 TH/s)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 25% better power draw (2,350 vs 3,150 W)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 Max 24% better efficacité (346 vs 263 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 Max 34% more heat output (8,018 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iBeLink BM-S1 Metric iBeLink BM-S1 Max
$768 Upfront cost (MSRP) $899
-$5.41 Daily net profit -$7.16
-$2,744 Net after 1 year -$3,513
-$4,720 Net after 2 years -$6,127
-$6,696 Net after 3 years -$8,740
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink BM-S1

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-S1 Max

262.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S1 Max?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.41/day compared to $-7.16/day for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S1 Max better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S1 Max?

The iBeLink BM-S1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S1 and iBeLink BM-S1 Max?

The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S1 Max runs at 262.5 J/TH — a difference of 83.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficacité (346 vs 263 J/TH).