iBeLink BM-S1 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 14.0 TH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 345.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 235.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1
Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC5 Pro II l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 106% more hashrate (6.8 vs 14.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-S1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC5 Pro II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 106% more hashrate (6.8 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S1 29% better power draw (2,350 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 32% better efficacité (346 vs 236 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S1 22% better weight (9.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 40% more heat output (8,018 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S1 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| $768 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$5.41 | Daily net profit | -$7.45 |
| -$2,744 | Net after 1 year | -$3,351 |
| -$4,720 | Net after 2 years | -$6,072 |
| -$6,696 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro II235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC5 Pro II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.41/day compared to $-7.45/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 or the Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
The iBeLink BM-S1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC5 Pro II on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 109.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (346 vs 236 J/TH).