VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| VOLCMINER D1 Pro | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 800.0 MH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 194,444.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 21.0 kg | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| VOLCMINER | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
VOLCMINER D1 Pro
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le VOLCMINER D1 Pro l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 2150% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the VOLCMINER D1 Pro's favour. That said, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the VOLCMINER D1 Pro and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 2150% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 69% better efficacité (194,444 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 85% better weight (21.0 vs 3.2 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 600% more heat output (11,942 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 72% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| VOLCMINER D1 Pro | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $7,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$8.40 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$10,916 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$13,982 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$17,047 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 Pro194,444.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-8.40/day for the VOLCMINER D1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the VOLCMINER D1 Pro or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is quieter at 55 dB compared to the VOLCMINER D1 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the VOLCMINER D1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the VOLCMINER D1 Pro and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III on J/TH?
The VOLCMINER D1 Pro runs at 194,444.4 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 430,555.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (194,444 vs 625,000 J/TH).