Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Specification | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 930.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 930 W | Consommation électrique | 950 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 237.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7.3 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 3,173 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,241 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell SC Lite
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC Lite comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 330% more hashrate (0.9 vs 4.0 TH/s). The Goldshell HS3-SE claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell SC Lite sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC Lite 330% more hashrate (0.9 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 2% better power draw (930 vs 950 W)
- Goldshell SC Lite 76% better efficacité (1,000 vs 238 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 23% better weight (7.3 vs 9.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC Lite 2% more heat output (3,173 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Metric | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $130 |
| -$2.20 | Daily net profit | -$2.15 |
| -$2,503 | Net after 1 year | -$914 |
| -$3,307 | Net after 2 years | -$1,697 |
| -$4,110 | Net after 3 years | -$2,481 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Lite237.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC Lite: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Lite is more profitable at $-2.15/day compared to $-2.20/day for the Goldshell HS3-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS3-SE or Goldshell SC Lite?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Lite runs at 237.5 J/TH — a difference of 762.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (1,000 vs 238 J/TH).