Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

IceRiver KS0 Pro

IceRiver KS0 Pro

Taux de hachage 200.0 GH/s Puissance 100 W Efficiency 500.0 J/TH
VS
IceRiver KS5L

IceRiver KS5L

Taux de hachage 12.0 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 283.3 J/TH

IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS5L

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

IceRiver KS0 Pro Specification IceRiver KS5L
200.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 12.0 TH/s
100 W Consommation électrique 3,400 W
500.0 J/TH Efficiency 283.3 J/TH
35 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
2.5 kg Weight 15.0 kg
341 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
IceRiver Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

IceRiver KS0 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000009 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.24
Daily Profit -$0.23
Monthly -$7.03
Yearly -$85.48

IceRiver KS5L

Daily Revenue 0.00000543 BTC $0.35
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.81
Monthly -$234.34
Yearly -$2,851.14

Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The IceRiver KS0 Pro and IceRiver KS5L finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS0 Pro and IceRiver KS5L sit on each measurable spec:

  • IceRiver KS5L 5900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 12.0 TH/s)
  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
  • IceRiver KS5L 43% better efficacité (500 vs 283 J/TH)
  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
  • IceRiver KS5L 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

IceRiver KS0 Pro Metric IceRiver KS5L
$199 Upfront cost (MSRP) $12,000
-$0.23 Daily net profit -$7.81
-$284 Net after 1 year -$14,851
-$370 Net after 2 years -$17,702
-$455 Net after 3 years -$20,553
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

IceRiver KS0 Pro

Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

IceRiver KS5L

283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 Pro or the IceRiver KS5L?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.81/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS0 Pro or IceRiver KS5L?

The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the IceRiver KS5L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS5L: which fits a residential setup better?

The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS0 Pro and IceRiver KS5L?

The IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 216.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (500 vs 283 J/TH).