IceRiver KS5L vs SuperScalar K10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS5L | Specification | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 45.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 1,845 W |
| 283.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 41,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 8.3 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,295 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | SuperScalar |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS5L
SuperScalar K10
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS5L comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 26567% more hashrate (12.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS5L's favour. That said, the SuperScalar K10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS5L and SuperScalar K10 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS5L 26567% more hashrate (12.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- SuperScalar K10 46% better power draw (3,400 vs 1,845 W)
- IceRiver KS5L 99% better efficacité (283 vs 41,000 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 45% better weight (15.0 vs 8.3 kg)
- IceRiver KS5L 84% more heat output (11,601 vs 6,295 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS5L 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS5L | Metric | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,200 |
| -$7.82 | Daily net profit | -$4.43 |
| -$14,853 | Net after 1 year | -$6,816 |
| -$17,707 | Net after 2 years | -$8,432 |
| -$20,560 | Net after 3 years | -$10,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS5LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS5L vs SuperScalar K10: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the SuperScalar K10 is more profitable at $-4.43/day compared to $-7.82/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS5L or the SuperScalar K10 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS5L is quieter at 75 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS5L vs SuperScalar K10: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS5L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS5L and SuperScalar K10?
The IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH while the SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,716.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (283 vs 41,000 J/TH).