IceRiver KS5L vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS5L | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 283.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS5L
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS5L edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 17% better efficacité (283 vs 343 J/TH) in the IceRiver KS5L's favour. The Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS5L and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS5L 14% more hashrate (12.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS5L 6% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,600 W)
- IceRiver KS5L 17% better efficacité (283 vs 343 J/TH)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 3% better weight (15.0 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 6% more heat output (11,601 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS5L 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS5L | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$7.81 | Daily net profit | -$8.33 |
| -$14,851 | Net after 1 year | -$8,582 |
| -$17,702 | Net after 2 years | -$11,624 |
| -$20,553 | Net after 3 years | -$14,666 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS5LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS5L vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS5L is more profitable at $-7.81/day compared to $-8.33/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS5L vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS5L or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The IceRiver KS5L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS5L vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 59.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficacité (283 vs 343 J/TH).