Goldshell SC Box II vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell SC Box II | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 210.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell SC Box II
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell SC6 SE, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 795% more hashrate (1.9 vs 17.0 TH/s). The Goldshell SC Box II holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell SC Box II and Goldshell SC6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC6 SE 795% more hashrate (1.9 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Box II 88% better power draw (400 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 8% better efficacité (211 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 80% better weight (2.3 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 725% more heat output (1,365 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Box II 214% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell SC Box II | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $379 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$0.90 | Daily net profit | -$7.35 |
| -$706 | Net after 1 year | -$3,713 |
| -$1,034 | Net after 2 years | -$6,398 |
| -$1,361 | Net after 3 years | -$9,082 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC Box IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell SC Box II vs Goldshell SC6 SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.90/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell SC Box II or the Goldshell SC6 SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell SC Box II vs Goldshell SC6 SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell SC Box II vs Goldshell SC6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 16.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficacité (211 vs 194 J/TH).