iPollo V1 Mini vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 240 W | Consommation électrique | 620 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | — |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-Q edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 550% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini and Jasminer X16-Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q 550% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini 61% better power draw (240 vs 620 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 60% better efficacité (800,000 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 158% more heat output (819 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 110% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $300 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $789 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$510 | Net after 1 year | -$1,332 |
| -$720 | Net after 2 years | -$1,875 |
| -$931 | Net after 3 years | -$2,418 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini or the Jasminer X16-Q?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini vs Jasminer X16-Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini or the Jasminer X16-Q?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Mini and Jasminer X16-Q?
The iPollo V1 Mini runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 482,051.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficacité (800,000 vs 317,949 J/TH).