Aisen A1 Pro vs Whatsminer M60
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Aisen A1 Pro | Specification | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 170.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,383 W |
| 95.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,543 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Aisen | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Aisen A1 Pro
Whatsminer M60
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M60, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 639% more hashrate (23.0 vs 170.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M60's favour. That said, the Aisen A1 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Aisen A1 Pro and Whatsminer M60 sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M60 639% more hashrate (23.0 vs 170.0 TH/s)
- Aisen A1 Pro 35% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,383 W)
- Whatsminer M60 79% better efficiency (95.7 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60 54% more heat output (7,506 vs 11,543 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Aisen A1 Pro | Metric | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,800 |
| -$4.44 | Daily net profit | -$1.93 |
| -$1,622 | Net after 1 year | -$5,506 |
| -$3,244 | Net after 2 years | -$6,213 |
| -$4,865 | Net after 3 years | -$6,919 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6019.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Aisen A1 Pro vs Whatsminer M60: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60 is more profitable at $-1.93/day compared to $-4.44/day for the Aisen A1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Aisen A1 Pro or the Whatsminer M60 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M60 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Aisen A1 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Aisen A1 Pro or the Whatsminer M60?
The Whatsminer M60 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Aisen A1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Aisen A1 Pro and Whatsminer M60 on J/TH?
The Aisen A1 Pro runs at 95.7 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 75.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (95.7 vs 19.9 J/TH).