Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 330.0 MH/s |
| 960 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 1,920,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 727,272.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 3,276 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 75% better power draw (960 vs 240 W). The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) holds the edge in price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 sit on each measurable spec:
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 52% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 75% better power draw (960 vs 240 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 62% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 727,273 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 2.4 kg)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 300% more heat output (3,276 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 113% more home mining score (31.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| $469 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $899 |
| -$2.30 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$1,310 | Net after 1 year | -$1,109 |
| -$2,151 | Net after 2 years | -$1,319 |
| -$2,992 | Net after 3 years | -$1,530 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330727,272.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,192,727.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 727,273 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster